Sous la direction de CAULIEZ (Jessie), S\u00e9n\u00e9part (Ingrid), JALLOT (Luc), de Labriffe (Pierre-Arnaud), GILABERT (Christophe) et Gutherz (Xavier)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Les \u00e9tudes sur les pratiques fun\u00e9raires ont connu un large d\u00e9veloppement dans le Midi de la France. Plusieurs rencontres, tables rondes et colloques se sont fait l\u2019\u00e9cho de ces th\u00e9matiques depuis une dizaine d\u2019ann\u00e9es (du colloque de Saint-Germain-en-Laye de 2001 \u00ab Pratiques fun\u00e9raires du N\u00e9olithique ancien et moyen \u00bb au r\u00e9cent colloque de Saint-Pons sur la statuaire m\u00e9galithique). Les Rencontres M\u00e9ridionales de Pr\u00e9histoire R\u00e9cente ont \u00e9galement rendu compte de leur c\u00f4t\u00e9, au cours de leurs sessions successives, du dynamisme de cette th\u00e9matique. Ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es, les communications concernaient surtout les journ\u00e9es d\u2019actualit\u00e9 et portaient pour l\u2019essentiel sur les m\u00e9thodes de fouilles, les gestes fun\u00e9raires, le mobilier, les architectures et les types fonctionnels. L\u2019espace fun\u00e9raire (de l\u2019espace de la s\u00e9pulture au site organis\u00e9) est finalement un aspect moins trait\u00e9 et qui n\u2019a jamais fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une approche th\u00e9matique dans les RMPR. Pourtant, ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es, l\u2019arch\u00e9ologie pr\u00e9ventive a permis d\u2019enrichir cette probl\u00e9matique, \u00e9galement d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e dans le cadre de recherches programm\u00e9es. Le Midi de la France a en effet la chance de poss\u00e9der un patrimoine fun\u00e9raire, appartenant \u00e0 la Pr\u00e9histoire r\u00e9cente, particuli\u00e8rement abondant et bien conserv\u00e9. Les fouilles des dolmens, des ossuaires en grotte ou d\u2019inhumations en pleine terre, de s\u00e9pultures simples, multiples, collectives, r\u00e9investissant des zones d\u2019habitat ou constituant des ensembles autonomes, ont fourni de nombreuses donn\u00e9es souvent in\u00e9dites. Ces donn\u00e9es permettent d\u2019envisager la place des ensembles fun\u00e9raires au sein de l\u2019espace humanis\u00e9, en rapport ou non avec l\u2019habitat (fonction identitaire des tombes, gestion et \u00e9volution des lieux, p\u00e9rennit\u00e9 de ces espaces, formation des paysages fun\u00e9raires, dynamique de peuplement, relation de compl\u00e9mentarit\u00e9, organisation du territoire des vivants et des morts).<\/p>\n
Comme \u00e0 l\u2019accoutum\u00e9e, la session th\u00e9matique du colloque est suivie d\u2019une session portant sur l\u2019actualit\u00e9 de la recherche au travers de contributions portant sur la Pr\u00e9histoire r\u00e9cente (ici du N\u00e9olithique \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e2ge du Bronze).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Studies of funerary practices have seen significant developments in southern France. Several meetings, round-tables and colloquia have addressed this topic over the past fifteen years (from the Saint-Germain-en-Laye colloquium in 2001 \u201cPratiques fun\u00e9raires du N\u00e9olithique ancien et moyen\u201d to the recent Saint-Pons colloquium on megalithic statuary). During their successive sessions, the Rencontres M\u00e9ridionales de Pr\u00e9histoire R\u00e9cente (Southern Meetings on Recent Prehistory) have also addressed the developments made this field. Presentations in recent years have mainly concerned new discoveries and results, mostly addressing excavation methods, funerary activities, artifacts, architecture and functional types. The funerary space (the space from the grave to the organized site) has received less attention and had never been the subject of a thematic session in the RMPR. In recent years, however, preventive archaeology has contributed new elements to this research topic, also developed in the context of programmed research. Southern France has a particularly abundant and well-preserved corpus of funerary sites dating to recent Prehistory. The excavation of dolmens, cave ossuaries or open-air inhumations, single, multiple and collective burials, reinvesting settlement zones or constituting autonomous sites, have all provided numerous and often previously unknown data. These data contribute to our understanding of the role of funerary remains within spaces invested by humans, related to settlements or not (identity function of tombs, organization and evolution of spaces, permanence of spaces, regional organization of the living and dead).<\/p>\n
As is customary, the thematic session of this colloquium was followed by a session on research news through contributions concerning recent Prehistory (here from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sous la direction de CAULIEZ (Jessie), S\u00e9n\u00e9part (Ingrid), JALLOT (Luc), de Labriffe (Pierre-Arnaud), GILABERT (Christophe) et Gutherz (Xavier) Les \u00e9tudes sur les pratiques fun\u00e9raires ont connu un large d\u00e9veloppement […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":539,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"product_brand":[],"product_cat":[166],"product_tag":[178,91,21,105,92,97,23,99,118,83],"class_list":{"0":"post-541","1":"product","2":"type-product","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"product_cat-monographies-syntheses-et-colloques","7":"product_tag-aquitaine","8":"product_tag-archeozoologie","9":"product_tag-ceramique","10":"product_tag-chronologie","11":"product_tag-funeraire","12":"product_tag-habitat","13":"product_tag-industrie-lithique","14":"product_tag-languedoc","15":"product_tag-mediterranee","16":"product_tag-midi-pyrenees","17":"pa_isbn-175","18":"pa_nombre-de-pages-176","19":"pa_poids-2325-g","20":"has_thumb","22":"first","23":"outofstock","24":"taxable","25":"shipping-taxable","26":"purchasable","27":"product-type-simple"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/product\/541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=541"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_brand","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fproduct_brand&post=541"},{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fproduct_cat&post=541"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archeoaep.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fproduct_tag&post=541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}